TECHNICAL SEO AUDIT
Crawl waste, index bloat and pages that should never have been indexed.
GOOGLE HAS SPENT YEARS AIMING ATSITES LIKE YOURS. THE ONES STILLSTANDING DID SOMETHING DIFFERENT.
Reported in commission earned, not impressions.
Crypto, iGaming, finance, and what each one costs you in risk.
Rankings that hold through core updates, not spikes.
Under NDA. Your domains appear in none of our public work.
Crawl waste, index bloat and pages that should never have been indexed.
Why the update hit you, and what actually brings a site back.
Real testing and real screenshots. What the reviews updates reward.
Named authors and a reason for anyone to trust the site.
Your money pages, built to survive the next update.
What you bought before we met, and what it is likely to cost.
Slower than a network, and still there next year.
One offer per market with hreflang set, so no two pages compete.
Spread the risk so one update cannot end the month.
Fast pages for readers comparing on a phone.
Guards your rankings against penalties, scrapers and negative SEO.
A core update halved you overnight. We find out why today, not next quarter.
MORE
COMMISSION
RANKINGS THAT
SURVIVE UPDATES
RISK SPREAD
ACROSS SITES
Technical SEO, first-hand content and a link profile that will not get you removed, built for sites that live or die on organic alone.
You do not own a product, a shop or a brand anyone searches by name. Organic is not one channel among several, it is the entire business. And Google has spent the last few years writing updates aimed squarely at sites like yours. That turns the question from how do we rank into how are we still here after the next one.
Sometimes, and never by tweaking. The sites that come back are the ones that changed what they actually are: original testing instead of rewritten spec sheets, real people behind the reviews, and the thin pages removed rather than polished. It takes months, and if we think a domain is not worth that effort we will say so instead of billing you to find out.
We will not do it for you, and the reason is arithmetic rather than principle. In crypto and iGaming the paid link market is enormous and it works right up until it does not. When a manual action lands you do not lose a campaign, you lose the business, because the site is the business. We build slower and it is still there next year.
On reviews and anything money-related, yes. Since the reviews updates Google effectively asks who tested this, what they compared it against and why anyone should believe them. An anonymous site full of rewritten affiliate copy has no answer, and that is the clearest line between the sites that survived the last three years and the ones that did not.
It changes the arithmetic. Twenty thin sites is twenty times the exposure to a single update. The better play is usually fewer, stronger properties, and real diversification across verticals rather than across near-identical domains, because near-identical domains all get hit by the same update on the same morning.
Access to the sites, Search Console and analytics, an honest account of what links you have bought and from where, and which offers actually pay. The link history matters most. We cannot plan around what we do not know about, and we find it eventually anyway.
SEO field notes, growth breakdowns, web strategy, and operator-first ideas from Laid Back Llama®. No fluff. No spam. Just useful moves.
GET THE NOTES
Actionable ideas to improve visibility, trust, and growth.